Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:58 am
’ In particular, while Corsair alleges its mark is well known to computer manufacturers who purchase its products, Corsair never alleges facts which would show its mark is well known by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
The appraisers valued the residential units at $70,000 and $75,000 per unit respectively. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion last week in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
The Court concluded, unanimously, that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents’ express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
Moore a/k/a Sheik Mark Stanton Moore-El,' rather than 'Sheik Mark Stanton Moore-El a/k/a Mark S. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:51 am
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Self of Spencer, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration Numbers 1,713,815, 4,912,172, 1,705,521, 2,868,784, 1,728,274, and 4,925,141 (collectively the “IU Marks”). [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 7:23 pm
As we meet for these pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 pm
Plaintiff itself acknowledged this crowded field in its application to the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:14 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
Christie v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:34 am
[E]ven in the United States there appears to be several trade marks which incorporate the words “magic bra” and therefore even in the United States the term is common or descriptive….. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:35 pm
CAAF ruled 3-2 in United States v. [read post]
