Search for: "United States v. State of Washington"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Strauss's main point was to reassure readers that it really didn’t matter all that much that Article V made the United States Constitution so notably difficult to amend. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am
Under the quo warranto law, the federal district court in Washington may issue a writ of quo warranto against anyone in the District who unlawfully holds “a public office of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
United States, limiting the scope of its 2005 ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
Associate Editor in Chief Jim Jones penned the second article, “United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:50 pm
Then again, is not quite what Justice White was talking about in his concurring and dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:52 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960). [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
On May 17, 1934, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs debated the terms of the IRA. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The plaintiffs in Edakunni v. [read post]
Workplace Mass Shootings Are A Reminder That Employers Need Legally Compliant Workplace Gun Policies
9 May 2023, 12:17 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
RAC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am
On October 20, 1803, the Senate ratified a treaty with France, promoted by President Thomas Jefferson, that doubled the size of the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Recall 1968 and the failed confirmation of Abe Fortas to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States is certainly not new to scandal. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
