Search for: "V D"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 76,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Mereworth v Ministry of Justice [2011] EWHC 1589 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 217 “The court did not have jurisdiction to decide whether a hereditary peer was entitled to a writ of summons thereby entitling him to sit and vote in the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:53 am
Blight and others v Brewster: [2012] EWHC 165 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 26 “Bankrupts who were subject to an order for enforcement of a judgment had to take both the benefits and burdens of their bankruptcy and should not be allowed to hide their assets in pension funds when they had a right to withdraw monies needed to pay their creditors.” WLR Daily, 9th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:41 am
Regina v James and another; [2011] EWCA Crim 2991; [2011] WLR (D) 389 “Expenditure on scales, machinery parts, rent and wages for casual workers were not sums obtained as a result of or in connection with criminal conduct, in this case the evasion of excise duty on tobacco products, and therefore did not amount to a benefit from criminal conduct for the purposes of section 76(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.” WLR Daily, 21st December 2011… [read post]
18 May 2007, 8:47 pm
The discussion was moderated by Edward D. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:16 am
Regina v Ahmad and another [2012] EWCA Crim 391; [2012] WLR (D) 62 “Sums banked as the result of the sale or purported sale of goods by a buffer company in the course of a carousel fraud generating false claims for the repayment of VAT were not property obtained ‘in connection with [the] commission’ of the offence within section 71(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.” WLR Daily, 2nd March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
Tido v The Queen [2011] UKPC 16; [2011] WLR (D) 199 “A dock identification of a defendant was not inadmissible evidence per se. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:08 am
Schmitt v Deichmann and others [2012] EWHC 62 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 8 “The court had an inherent jurisdiction under the common law to permit the statutory power under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986, preventing transactions defrauding creditors, to be applied to a foreign administrator not falling within the express scope of the 1986 Act.” WLR Daily, 23rd January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:02 am
Ramzan v Brookwide Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 985; [2011] WLR (D) 278 “Where an owner of property was unable to use part of his property due to its misappropriation by another, it was not appropriate to award in addition to damages for loss of profits arising from the inability to use the property, damages for breach of trust and mesne profits, since those heads of damages overlapped. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:35 am
Regina v Dobson [2011] WLR (D) 221 “The principle that, even where there was a logical inconsistency in the verdicts of a jury, a conviction might be safe if the court found that there was an explanation for the inconsistency was subject to the limitation that the explanation had to fall within the parameters of the case as summed up by the trial judge. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Regina v Court and another: [2012] EWCA Crim 133; [2012] WLR (D) 27 “The ingredients of the common law offence of keeping a disorderly house required that the services provided were open to members of the public and were of such a character and conducted in such a manner that their provision amounted to an outrage to public decency. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:01 am
Author Wags05 Licence Copyright waived by the Author Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Nugee and Birss and Lady Justice Laing) Vestel Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. and another v Access Advance LLC and another [2021] (26 March 2021) [2021] WLR(D) 178, [2021] EWCA Civ 440Many of the tellies that are sold in this country under such brands as Toshiba, Hitachi, Telefunken and Panasonic [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
North Dakota In Quill v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:17 pm
You might wonder why this transfer is not exempt under subsection 14(3)(d). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
For the appellees: Paul D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Thomas, Minnesota)Daniel D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Thomas, Minnesota)Daniel D. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:52 am
Adopting the 'poignant descriptive words' of Munby J (as he then was) in Re D (Intractable Contact Dispute: Publicity) [2004] 1 FLR 1226, His Honour Judge Clifford Bellamy began his judgment in Warwickshire County Council v TE & Ors [2010] EWHC B19 yesterday as follows:"On 21 July 2010 a wholly deserving father left my court in tears having been driven to abandon his battle to implement an order which I had made on 4th January 2010 that his son, S, now aged 12,… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
PLLC v D&D Dev., Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
That is where Defense Distributed v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:00 pm
In Goodman v. [read post]
