Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ed. 2d 153 (2013) (joined opinion) “water compact insulated stateswater statutes from dormant Commerce Clause challenge insofar as challenge applied to surface water subject to that compact” United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Pace Law School Library
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:40 am by Darien Shanske
The doctrine was also discussed in the briefs, including that of the United States, which appeared as an amicus in support of neither party. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by Jeremy Malcolm
In the United States, such a mashup would fall squarely within the scope of the fair use right. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:57 am
"   Judge Orders Interior to Re-examine Water Pipeline Plan "A federal judge in Washington has ordered the Interior Department to re-examine its plans to divert water from the Missouri River into an arid section of North Dakota, granting requests from both the state of Missouri and the Canadian province of Manitoba, which united against the project. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am by JB
Virginia, decided in 1967 during the high water mark of the Warren Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am by Jordan Brunner
Federal Republic of Ethiopia that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act gives state-sponsored hackers immunity, while Emma Kohse discussed the history and current state of the ATS suit Salim v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
Department of Defense, which asks whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s definition of the “waters of the United States” must be brought in federal district court or in a federal court of appeals, observing that the “Supreme Court has likely stepped in to resolve this dispute because it is a waste of judicial resources for federal courts of appeals to decide whether WOTUS regulations are lawful if they don’t have the… [read post]