Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
There's no mention of how 14 year old brains don't process things the same way as adults. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Until that happens, there's a possibility that the adverse case might drop from sight without a trace.We're not in the business of helping the other side make bad law (not intentionally, anyway).And that possibility does happen, we know of at least two-and-a-half (don't ask, because we aren't telling) instances just in the preemption area. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:47 pm
He’d referred to another media controversy in which a police officer was facing DUI charges and telling a prosecutor that “we’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t,” the judge wrote.The judge added that the “police conduct in this case which led to the arrest of the defendant is exactly the type of conduct which the exclusionary rule is meant to deter. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
I don't want them to feel intimidated in any way…. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:40 am
I've made the point that judges who see their bench as a bully pulpit to flail their personal issues, whether by haranguing defendants at sentence or refusing to adhere to law with which they don't agree, have no business wearing the robe. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 8:13 am
Of course, it probably didn't hurt that Judge Baylson is also the author of Colacicco v. [read post]
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
It's the stuff that is in the inside of an eyewitness's mind that jurors don't understand. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:03 am
They don't care about prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:21 pm
That’s why we use only tobacco and water. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am
Typically, even where infringement was established, defendants usually came up with pretty good workarounds, often of the kind that consumers didn't even notice. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Judges don't expose probationers to death to make a point and curry public favor.And what is probation to do with this? [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 3:08 am
I don't know why. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:13 am
(Editors' Note: As loyal readers know, we don't always agree with the decisions of our Article III judges, and we don't mind saying so. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 6:04 am
Lawyers just aren't a homogeneous group, and they don't have homogeneous incentives. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:52 am
In this division, the Constitution means something,';' Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Betty Butchko told lawyers Friday.Rumpole wonders: What does Judge Butchko know about other divisions that we don't? [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
" I don't doubt that it would be litigated. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Ans- I don’t think he come out to my house but three times. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:22 pm
We regulate crime and prescribe punishment (Polanski at Sentencing Law and Policy and The End of an Era at Defending People). [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
Some of the most vital political movements today — Black Lives Matter is the obvious example — don’t have centralized leadership and don’t have the same kinds of resources behind them. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
But then we get the oddity that in principle a very weak precedent can be strengthened by repeated reconsideration and reaffirmation.I don't have a good theoretical solution to what strikes me as a genuine puzzle. [read post]
