Search for: "v. Park" Results 2741 - 2760 of 17,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 11:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Most of the plaintiffs lose these cases on free speech grounds, and this case is no different.The case is Meyers v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:24 am by Silver Law Group
The company is also facing an SEC investigation, is the subject of a class action lawsuit, and is conducting an investigation into possible wrongdoing by CEO Michael V. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am by Jan von Hein
Following the Advocate General’s opinion and the CJEU’s judgement in Pula Parking (C-551/15 – ECLI:EU:C:2017:193), the Court notes that ‘it is irrelevant that certain activities were carried out upon delegation from a State’ (para. 39). [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Surplus proceeds On January 24, 2017, Eva August Homes, LLC, appellant, purchased a residential home located at 258 Catalina Circle, Severna Park, Maryland (“the property”) at a foreclosure sale from Carrie M. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:37 pm by Steven M. Sweat
When he arrived, he was told to park at an area where a forklift could unload the bins. [read post]