Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2010, 5:49 am
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. 58780. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363].) [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:10 am
In a December 29, 2009 decision in the case of EDB v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
Generally speaking, the Court upheld the old adage that you can't get something for nothing. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:37 pm
Judicial Career Blog: What would you say are the highlights of your tenure on the Superior, Chancery and Supreme Courts? [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 4:14 am
The Court said "[n]ow that the Statute has been clarified by the Court, attorneys are on notice of the requirement. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:05 am
Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in [Jackson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Criminal Procedural Law § 210.20(g) states in pertinent part that after arraignment upon an indictment, the superior court may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such indictment or any count thereof upon the ground that the defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
General Maritime Management Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
In 2008, the California Supreme Court addressed this issue in Save Tara v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm
The Act does not create parental rights for would-be parents who arrange for the creation of a baby.In 1992, the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the Act in the case of John Doe -v- Michigan Attorney General, holding:As overwhelmingly repugnant as the thought may be, unbridled surrogacy for profit could encourage the treatment of babies as commodities. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
The Act does not create parental rights for would-be parents who arrange for the creation of a baby.In 1992, the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the Act in the case of John Doe -v- Michigan Attorney General, holding:As overwhelmingly repugnant as the thought may be, unbridled surrogacy for profit could encourage the treatment of babies as commodities. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari had four interveners (including the Attorney General of Canada, who, as in the Kazemi case, defended the constitutionality of the Act). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:52 am
Will SF Superior Court Commissioner Arlene T. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:16 am
Superior Court, (1995) 31 Cal. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Superior Court (NexBio, Inc.) [read post]
