Search for: "BELL v. STATE" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages:  Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
After summarizing the well established law governing Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss securities class action complaints, see In re Authentidate, at 2-3, including Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:37 am by Michael Scutt
    January   Not much will happen this month while everyone looks in astonishment at their credit card bills, but just a reminder that the Vento guidelines on awards to be made in cases of injury to feelings in discrimination cases look to have been increased late last year in the case of Da’Bell v NSPCC. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am by Jarod Bona
Antitrust law, after all, protects competition and, as the Supreme Court pointed out in Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
Why go on and on about Lawrence v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Sharpe, citing Justice Cardozo in the 1937 American case of Palko v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]