Search for: "BRIGHT V US" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
  The 12th District, in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:59 am by Lubiner, Schmidt & Palumbo, LLC
Do all real estate deals have to be registered as securities or can exemptions to registration be used? [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:27 pm
v=MR0ZXvLg7YY&feature=player_embedded  www.gmodules.com="" ig="" ifr? [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Eugene Volokh
K.D. v D.D., officially released today by the Appellate Court of Connecticut, in an opinion by Judge Douglas Lavine, joined by Chief Judge William Bright and then-Judge Joan Alexander, involved a restraining order obtained by a divorcing wife against her husband: [The plaintiff wife] testified that on the evening of June 24, 2021, she went to a restaurant with a group of others, including friends of the defendant. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:00 am by David J. DePaolo
Drug Enforcement Administration schedules of controlled substances.In the meantime, an unnamed Texas insurance company requested that national drug-testing laboratory Ameritox screen urine samples from injured workers to determine the rate of illicit drug use. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:31 pm by Kevin
That is the first paragraph of the motion to dismiss Suero v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:31 am by SHG
Granted, it comes on the heels of Loper Bright and Trump v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:04 pm by Joshua Fox and David Gobel
”  He also noted that “in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm by lawmrh
One test used by courts to assess fee reasonableness or the lack thereof, is that which, ‘shocks the conscience of the court.‘  But in practice, the ‘shock the conscience‘ test seems too ethereal, too ambiguous, as helpful as Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity, “But I know it when I see it.” [1] Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  The most trenchant of them was offered by Judge David Sentelle in  United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As a result, the decision provides bright-line clarity for time limits on Rule 23(f) appeals of class certification orders. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Navy seamen against companies who made equipment used aboard ships. [read post]