Search for: "Bell v State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
After summarizing the well established law governing Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss securities class action complaints, see In re Authentidate, at 2-3, including Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Dallas did away with two Southern belles. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages: Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
January Not much will happen this month while everyone looks in astonishment at their credit card bills, but just a reminder that the Vento guidelines on awards to be made in cases of injury to feelings in discrimination cases look to have been increased late last year in the case of Da’Bell v NSPCC. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm
" But this is exactly the kind of allegation the Supreme Court rejected in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:09 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am
Antitrust law, after all, protects competition and, as the Supreme Court pointed out in Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
Why go on and on about Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:55 am
–Meta v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm
Sharpe, citing Justice Cardozo in the 1937 American case of Palko v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
The next question asked about the landmark case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
