Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 2761 - 2780 of 12,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
To be sure, the settled jurisprudence on the grant of stay states that the three ingredients to be analyzed for the purpose of interim stay are: (a) the existence of a prima facie case; (b) balance of convenience; and (c) likelihood of irreparable injury. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:38 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Prop 22 prohibits workplace discrimination and requires that companies: (a) develop sexual harassment policies, (b) conduct criminal background checks, and (c) mandate safety training for drivers. [read post]
In addition to the quantifiable hard costs of paying ransom and hiring experts to mitigate damage and re/build cyber defenses, ransomware victims can be damaged by: (a) third-party liability to the customers and other original owners of compromised data; (b) interruption of business operations during the course of and recovery from an attack; and (c) injury to reputation value in the loss of consumer confidence, appearance of incompetence, and customer attrition. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
McKesson’s second highest paid employee in 2008 was Paul C. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:21 pm by Sahara Pynes
You may be familiar with the AB-5 ABC test, which provides that to establish independent contractor status in California beginning on January 1, 2020, employers must satisfy all three of the following prongs: A) The company must not be able to control or direct what the worker does, either by contract or in actual practice; B) The worker must perform tasks outside of the hiring entity’s usual course of business; and C) The worker must be engaged in an independently… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (c)  The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm by Marta Requejo
  These questions arose in the context of proceedings in which a Spanish intellectual property rights management society (the Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España, SGAE), is bringing a claim against the company Padawan S. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
TTAB is better suited, b/c at least get microcosm of LOC cases b/c of competing TM claimants. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:16 am by IncNow
Next, the corporation may want to announce the change on company literature, websites and internal company materials. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:31 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Section 204 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–4) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following: ‘‘(b) RECORDS AND REPORTS OF PRIVATE FUNDS. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:30 am
  If the company does not entertain your request to negotiate and amend the Liability Release Form, you should request the company to deny your request to amend in writing. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Birnie v HMA, Hodgson v HMA, Jude v HMA, McGowan v B, heard 11-12 Oct 2011. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Birnie v HMA, Hodgson v HMA, Jude v HMA, McGowan v B, heard 11-12 Oct 2011. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020 Manchester Building Society (Appellant)… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Birnie v HMA, Hodgson v HMA, Jude v HMA, McGowan v B, heard 11 – 12 Oct 2011. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 3:52 am by Broc Romanek
And the Court never suggested that because the “maker” of a false statement is primarily liable under subsection (b), he cannot also be liable under subsections (a) and (c). [read post]