Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 2761 - 2780 of 16,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 3:56 pm by Jodi Stein and Jennifer Dickson*
The Court stated that “the complex set of cross-references and interlocking provisions in the Zoning Resolution’s definition of open space … is part of an intricate statutory edifice with which… the definition of open space in ZR Section 12-10 comprises no less than 13 defined terms, many of which cross-reference other terms. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:56 pm by Jodi Stein and Jennifer Dickson*
The Court stated that “the complex set of cross-references and interlocking provisions in the Zoning Resolution’s definition of open space … is part of an intricate statutory edifice with which… the definition of open space in ZR Section 12-10 comprises no less than 13 defined terms, many of which cross-reference other terms. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
Id. at 23. (4) Finally, the defendant argued that the trial court erred by allowing cross-examination of his father and contended the State elicited irrelevant testimony from his father. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:30 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
The Supreme Court recently heard its first big Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) case, United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Meanwhile, in the state court system, several trial court judges limited Gallagher v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am by Cyberleagle
The government has now published the Final Response to its Consultation on the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:04 am by Chijioke Okorie
In September, South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal judgement in Milestone Beverage CC and Others v The Scotch Whisky Association and Other was handed down electronically. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am by CMS
  On 5 and 6 October 2020, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in the matter of Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
However, we seem not to appreciate the nexus between PIL and the promotion of cross border commercial transactions. [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:02 pm by Cory Doctorow
The rules for initiating investigations are set out in Chapter IV and the enforcement rules are in Chapter V. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
   On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]