Search for: "Decisive Media, Inc." Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 4:21 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background As I discussed in a recent post (here), in a May 8, 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
"   Accordingly, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Federal Circuit, finding the method claims to be patent ineligible and "[b]ecause petitioner's system and media claims add nothing of substance to the underlying abstract idea, we hold they too are patent ineligible under § 101. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
There is a post about the decision in the IPKat blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
" -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-06-18 http://t.co/nhmM6H8d9U -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-06-18: Google Inc’s YouTube to block music videos from indie labels… http://t.co/qlMpsUQ4oi -> SCOTUS affirms Alice patent decision http://t.co/18V6tMlbE8 -> Alice v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am by Jim Liles
Pro Football, Inc., resulted from a proceeding to cancel six trademark registrations used by the Washington Redskins football team. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:23 pm
In inviting the filing of amicus briefs on the issue, (Purple Commc’ns, Inc., NLRB, No. 21-CA-95151, invitation to file briefs 5/1/14), the Board signaled that it may overturn the Bush-era Register Guard decision, 351 NLRB 1110 (2007), which held that employees do not have a Section 7 right to use their employer-provided email for union organizing. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:23 pm by Jack Gearan
In inviting the filing of amicus briefs on the issue, (Purple Commc’ns, Inc., NLRB, No. 21-CA-95151, invitation to file briefs 5/1/14), the Board signaled that it may overturn the Bush-era Register Guard decision, 351 NLRB 1110 (2007), which held that employees do not have a Section 7 right to use their employer-provided email for union organizing. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am by Greg Mersol
There has been a great deal of coverage involving litigation by interns against various media and entertainment companies in New York. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
What does the Google decision mean, however, for the South African media, who process reams of personal information on a daily basis as part of their reporting functions? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
 Balls are often lost by golfers in the long grass, and that same word has often been said to characterise the trade mark law decisions of Europe's premier court, so Katfriend Daniel Alexander QC's attempt to secure a reference to the CJEU was quite a sensible one:50. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Ben
To be fair one US federal judge did support the erotic film company saying “Malibu [Media] is not what has been referred to … as a ‘copyright troll’ ”. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
CSR refers to the furtherance of social interests, and to the factoring of the effects on such social interests of corporate decisions, beyond a narrow and traditional focus on the maximization of shareholder or enterprise interest as the core basis for enterprise decision-making,[10] and as the foundation for determining the fulfillment, by corporate directors, of their obligations to enterprise and owner.[11] Central to this CSR focus was the objective of substituting a… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> CTS Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:23 am by Tom Goldstein
  We covered the hearing because the purpose of the amendment is to overrule several recent Supreme Court decisions, and to block later similar decisions in the future. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
This decision should undermine the increasing trend in the district courts to second-guess the remedies agreed to by regulators and defendants, and the concomitant media and political pressure to do so. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s decision now leaves farm labor contractor Global Horizons, Inc. as the sole defendant in the case. [read post]