Search for: "Doe v. Delaware"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Moreover, the presence of a staggered board does not change the analysis. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:36 am
Starting with Moran v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:17 am
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
Moreover, the presence of a staggered board does not change the analysis. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Thus, for example, the decision needs to have been made by independent directors but as we have long noted, Delaware does not insure that in fact directors labeled "independent" really are. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:47 pm
TW Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm
Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:32 am
The recent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:31 am
On January 28, 2011, the Delaware Supreme Court clarified in King v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:29 am
(Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Indeed, the Delaware Supreme Court in Berlin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
April 16, 2008) (“the mere fact that counsel . . . conferred with the witness during a break after the [opposition] completed his examination does not warrant sanctions”); Henry v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
But that shows precisely why an “optional” approach does not work. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:43 pm
I doubt it for the Court does not announce any such major change in Delaware law and the decision seems limited to its peculiar facts. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
Sys. of La. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:10 pm
District Court of Delaware issued its ruling on post-trial motions filed by the parties in Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:28 pm
He does a good job of explaining Duthie v CorSolutions Medical Inc., 2008 WL 4173850 (Del. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:05 am
Delaware corporate practitioners are undoubtedly familiar with decision in VantagePoint v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
He summarizes three cases reaching three results: Mehraban v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Let's take a look at the three decisions:Mehraban v. [read post]
