Search for: "Doe v. Lee"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
It is well-established that Congress “does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions—it does not, one might say, hide elephants in mouseholes. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
In this article the case of McCulloch v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am
Insurance in Sanibel Island’s Lee County is concerned spiraling rates will both dampen real estate sales and hurt small business. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:50 am
(Disclosure: Professor Evan Lee, primary author of this amicus brief and its underlying research, is my colleague at UC Hastings.) [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: Motion Picture Association of America head Jack Valenti ____ Q: What does “CONTU” stand for? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:46 am
Roche v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Intellectual Property Directions) USPTO to hold Innovation Week 22-27 June (Patent Docs) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Obama’s environmentally-friendly present for supporters of the patent system (IAM) How to cut legal costs and improve results in troubled times (IP Frontline) PatentCluster – free clustering based patent search engine (Patent Baristas) Requesting withdrawal of the finality of an office action… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
Basically, copyright isn't keeping up with the digital environment, there are some stakeholders who have more power than others over/under the copyright system, and those more powerful stakeholders shouldn't be allowed to ride rough-shod over creatives who want to engage with digital technologies by using a regime that isn't able to self-regulate in response to these new circumstances in which copyright needs to operate": Keigh-Lee Paroz. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 10:01 am
Vavilov’s parents posed “as Canadians under the assumed names of Tracey Lee Ann Foley and Donald Howard Heathfield. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
Kennedy’s suddenly going to say he was wrong in Lee v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006), Lee v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006), Lee v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
The rule does not apply to individuals who have previously been denied asylum in one or more countries through which they traveled prior to arrival in the United States, victims of human trafficking, or individuals who have only passed through nations that have not signed international treaties on refugee protection. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm
[Author’s note: The Leon good-faith exception does not apply to violations of the North Carolina Constitution under State v. [read post]
