Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 2761 - 2780 of 41,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm by Russell Knight
Harvey, 286 Ill. 593, 601 (1919) “The decided weight of authority in this country supports the proposition that while a dead body is not considered as property, in the ordinary, technical sense in which that word is usually employed, yet the law does recognize a right, somewhat akin, perhaps, to a property right, arising out of the duty of the nearest relatives of the deceased to bury their dead, which authorizes and requires them to take possession and control of the dead body for… [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:07 am by Paige Waters, Stephanie O’Neill Macro
NAIC AI Model Bulletin – Adopted States Alaska: Bulletin B 24-01 – Adopted February 1, 2024 Arkansas: Bulletin 13-2024 – Adopted July 31, 2024 Connecticut: Bulletin No. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:22 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Call or email today 801-475-0123 effective 7/1/2017 30-3-10.1 Definitions — Joint legal custody — Joint physical custody. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:44 pm
"In other writings, I have sought to emphasize the significance of the various statutes that Congress has enacted pursuant to its authority under the Calling Forth Clause, most of which are today codified at 10 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:15 am by David Lynn
For example, we found that 46% of Fortune 100 companies included AI-related risk disclosures in their Forms 10-K and that such disclosures fall broadly into five buckets: (1) cybersecurity risk; (2) regulatory risk; (3) ethical and reputational risk; (4) operational risk; and (5) competition risk. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:09 am
This period is not extendable.One might ask if a voluntary publication under 1.221 does "count" as a publication under 35 USC 1.22(b) which states in pertinent part:(b) PUBLICATION.-(1) IN GENERAL. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
This requirement does not amount to an unduly high standard for due care on behalf of the applicant, as extensively argued by the [applicant] - both orally and in writing. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:39 pm by Richard Primus
  Which is uncomfortable because Possibility 1 is a subversion of the rule of law. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 8:21 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 6,864,796 and awarding $10 million in damages. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is thus evident that one claim does not encompass the other. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 7:27 am
Turning to the propriety of the Restriction Requirement itself, the Decision noted that claim 1 "does raise a question as to what 'linear' means with respect to the elected Fig. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:34 am by Walt Williams
CR 55(f)(1) does provide: When more than 1 year has elapsed after service of summons with no appearance being made, the court shall not . . . enter a judgment until a notice of the time and place of the application for . . . judgment is served on the party in default, not less than 10 days prior to the entry. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Section 3(1)(c) of the UK Act only prohibits registration of marks which consist “exclusively” of the specified characteristics and the FUNTIME mark does not consist exclusively thereof. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
Admissibility of the appeal1.1 In a situation such as the present case in which the request filed in the appeal proceedings does not expressly identify the subject of the appeal and the extent to which the decision is to be amended, as required by Rule 99(1)(c),(2) EPC, the latter can be ascertained from the appellant's overall submissions (see T 727/91, Reasons 1; T 273/92, Reasons 1).1.2 On the one hand, the appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
Admissibility of the appeal1.1 In a situation such as the present case in which the request filed in the appeal proceedings does not expressly identify the subject of the appeal and the extent to which the decision is to be amended, as required by Rule 99(1)(c),(2) EPC, the latter can be ascertained from the appellant's overall submissions (see T 727/91, Reasons 1; T 273/92, Reasons 1).1.2 On the one hand, the appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it… [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:01 am by Michael P. Fischerkeller
In the first 10 days of the Russian invasion, nearly 1 million Ukrainian civilians escaped to safety on the rail network. [read post]