Search for: "English v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 6,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:20 pm
” Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
Sullum notes the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
The English beheaded Mary, Queen of Scots, in 1587, but her trial took place before an English court. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:07 am
American Honda Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000); English v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Flores (08-289 and 08-294), on whether the courts below improperly declined to modify an injunction against Arizona for failing to provide sufficient funding for non-English speaking school children. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
V. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:10 pm
The Impresa case shows that English courts will not be quick to infer serious harm in cases involving relatively limited circulation which involve parties who are foreign, even if the allegations are serious. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 1980 case of Stone v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:52 am
Seuss Enters. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:13 am
Single Judge and four-factor test prescribed in paragraph 77 of the Nokia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:05 am
§1 (interesting states that "insane" includes "every idiot, insane person, and person non compos mentis")"Designed Quickly" - that is whether the taxpayer quickly designed to place property beyond the reach of the government, Fumo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:39 am
Modules III, V and VI, which address products, contain some common themes. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
These cases include Reed v. [read post]
