Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 9,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm
(Eugene Volokh) What happens when divorced parents with joint legal custody disagree about whether their child should be given the routine childhood immunizations? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:49 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From the Justice Department press release, issued last Friday: The department’s complaint alleges that Essex County refused to permit Yvette Beshier to wear a khimar (religiously-mandated headscarf) while working as a corrections officer.... [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I hadn’t seen much written about this decision, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
(Eugene Volokh) That’s the long but descriptive title of my new article, which I’ve finally gotten out the door and to law reviews. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That’s the argument made in Reedy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last week about this topic, and I thought I’d briefly follow up. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:26 am
(Eugene Volokh) May someone be barred from possessing a gun simply because he has been indicted for a felony? [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An excerpt from Debates of the [1872] Convention to Amend the Constitution of Pennsylvania (some paragraph breaks added). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:12 am
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:51 pm
(Eugene Volokh) For more about the essay (for an online symposium), see here; to read the full 9 pages, see here. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s Kentucky Court of Appeals decision in Mendez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:12 am
(Eugene Volokh) This happened in American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:15 am
(Eugene Volokh) David Lat (Above the Law) reports on an interesting e-mail exchange among the editors of the Harvard Human Rights Journal (which, like the great majority of law reviews, is edited by law students); I quote a long excerpt below. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Amazon.com v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The sentence reads, in a context that shows the authors agree with the argument:Proponents of a more refined First Amendment argue that this freedom should be treated not as a right but as a privilege — a special entitlement granted by the state on a conditional basis that can be revoked if it is ever abused or maltreated.That’s what’s written in the recently released Cyberbullying: A Report on Bullying in a Digital Age, published by the… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:31 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A fun line from a fun dissenting opinion, in Hanson v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:25 pm
(Jim Lindgren) Eugene [Volokh] quotes from an editor at the New Press who is peddling the ridiculous notion that [Michael] Bellesiles was a victim of an NRA conspiracy instead of someone who destroyed his own career by writing a book (Arming America) that did not hold up when some of us checked his evidence, including work based on hundreds of non-existent documents. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:54 am
(Eugene Volokh) I’m about to post something about an interesting new case on religious charities and employment discrimination law, so I thought it would be helpful to post this general summary I wrote a while back; I also hope to refer to it in future posts. * * * Federal job discrimination law provides three sets of religion-related rights to employees, public or private, when the employer has 15 or more employees. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:19 am
(Eugene Volokh) A question arose in connection with the Brandon Darby / New York Times controversy: Say that a newspaper (or some other entity) posts its own article on its site, believing it to be true, and not having serious doubts about its truth. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday’s People v. [read post]
