Search for: "Files v. State" Results 2761 - 2780 of 91,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 9:19 am by Kyle Persaud
Many people in Oklahoma wonder: What restrictions can the state put on my driver’s license? [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am by Erica Canas
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
Nearly all of the interested parties support keeping the settlement in place but the United States government--in its capacity as what Deputy SG Curtis Gannon called its "watchdog" role--objected that the bankruptcy court lacks authority to release third parties like the Sacklers (who did not file for personal bankruptcy) from liability. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Nortonjnorton@nfllp.com1250 Broadway, 27th Fl.New York, NY 10001(212) 619-5400# # #COMPLAINT: Adrian Dominican Sisters, et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
When the mortgagee-bank filed a foreclosure case with the Kings County Supreme Court, the mortgagor was served via the Secretary of State. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:31 am by Dennis Crouch
  Oral arguments were scheduled for December 4, 2023, but the parties filed a joint dismissal on December 3. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]