Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 26,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the well-publicized Assn. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
United States and Ohio v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
Tillett retained the right to use the KROMA mark in the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 3:48 am
United States of America v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
In the recent case of West v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
In the recent case of West v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]
5 May 2016, 12:34 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on Monday, May 2 and agreed to hear the case in Star Athletica LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 7:45 am
Ash moved back to the United States in 2017. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
In Ben-Hiam v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 3:29 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted Defendant HMW's motion to stay Primerica's civil action pending resolution of a TTAB cancellation proceeding involving the mark HOW MONEY WORKS for financial services. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:04 am
Plaintiff's renewed motion for a preliminary injunction precluding defendant "from launching in the United States its generic raloxifene product" was granted where defendant conceded infringement but contested validity and enforceability. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
"On Wednesday, CAAF will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:24 am
The Court thus made clear that its deeply controversial ruling of two years ago, in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:56 am
United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:55 am
The panel originally ruled in favor of United because it felt bound by a Seventh Circuit ruling in a similar case decided in 2000, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:33 am
The fact that the United States has recommended a denial strongly weighs against a grant, but the fact that the Court did not immediately denies cert somewhat mitigates the government’s position. [read post]
