Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 2761 - 2780 of 7,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
[Hat Tip: FoIB Jeff M and Brian D]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
I’m not sure the Super Bowl is an event where the folks expect to see boring pharmaceutical or laundry detergent ads. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If you’re in a similar situation above contact the experts and competent Nassau County Family Lawyers and the Nassau County Child Custody Attorneys at Stephen Bilkis and Associates. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:29 am
  In In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability Litigation, 2016 WL 311762 (E.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 5:35 am by SHG
Plus, I’m now an Admiral, which makes me pimptastic. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm by Kevin
According to Law360 (sub. required), that gift was given to the plaintiff’s attorney Mark Quigley, who got to ask things like, well, if you’re broke, “how do you buy the Ferraris and Bentleys and Mercedes[es]? [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by David M. Ward
So Mark Zuckerberg wears the same t-shirts and hoodies every day. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Editors
Former Biglaw partner and now in-house counsel Mark Hermann gives his thoughts on certain advice he never wants to give again – we’re sure some of his thoughts will resonate: “I’ve been practicing law for a long time. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am by Ron Coleman
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Whereas, other evidence like bite mark evidence, for example, we know is junk now. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
  When Mark Bennett reached out to him to inquire whether Zarrelli’s claim of being Ostrow’s mouthpiece was true. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:56 am by Doorey
 I’m assuming that this was a fixed term 6 month contract, although even that is questionable. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
I’m thinking K’ul Chocolate probably thought it was pretty cool the USPTO’s assigned examining attorney didn’t gum up the chocolate with arguments like these that prevented registration (just last year) of KÜL HANDBAGS for fashion handbags, based on the prior registered mark for COOL HANDBAGS (stylized) in connection with backpacks, beach bags; book bags; and gym bags: “Applicant’s mark and the registered mark are similar… [read post]