Search for: "JUDICIAL BRANCH "
Results 2761 - 2780
of 8,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2010, 9:55 pm
Here is the abstract: Since the advent of the New Judicial Federalism, scholars of state constitutions have developed a rich and textured account of state judicial approaches to state constitutional rights with federal analogues, at times questioning and at other times defending the legitimacy of different forms of doctrinal “divergence” and “convergence,” the latter often being referred to as the “unreflective adoption” or… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court, to aggressively review the work of the political branches. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 11:10 am
In theory, it frees up the political branches and the states to act without fear of judicial second-guessing. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
HJR 17-22 would be a general waiver of section 602(a) as it applies to the judicial branch and other specified agencies. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:22 am
Here is the abstract:Prompted by persistent complaints, particularly from the information and communication technology (ICT) industries, about the dangers allegedly posed by strong patents of poor quality, both the legislative and judicial branches have recently made attempts at patent reform. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:43 am
The Supreme Court unanimously vacated that opinion as erroneous, reminding the federal judge that he is not in the legislative branch and has no vote on the wisdom of federal statutes. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:19 pm
Neglect of the "classic rule" still encumbers conflict of laws analysis, and unduly constrains the potential for pragmatic legislative accommodation of competing interests - a function designated by "textually demonstrable constitutional commitment" as one for Congress alone, and not at all for the judicial branch under guise of constitutional construction. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 9:45 am
Article III of the Constitution tasks the judicial branch with resolving “cases” and “controversies,” not making policy.The obvious solution is to limit district courts to resolving the cases only between the parties before them. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:32 am
“The goal of the baby judge program is to make sure that people have the fundamentals that they need to be able to do the job,” said Judge Jeremy Fogel, the director of the Federal Judicial Center, the judicial branch’s research and education agency and organizer of the training. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Instead of targeting someone with implied or explicit threats, why not take some time to bone up on how our branches of government work? [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:00 am
“The Supreme Court is the most mysterious branch of government, and yet the Court is at root a human institution, made up of very bright people with very strong egos, for whom political and judicial conflicts often become personal. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:41 am
The result is a new politics aimed squarely at selecting and placing judicial ideologues on the Court, which has transformed the Court into an ideologically driven and polarized branch. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm
For example, Republican Presidential contender Rick Santorum laid out his view that the judicial branch of government is the least important branch. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:53 pm
By filing a writ of mandate, you empower the court (judicial branch) to evaluate the City's (legislative branch) decision and perhaps overturn it. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm
For example, Republican Presidential contender Rick Santorum laid out his view that the judicial branch of government is the least important branch. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:14 am
The judicial branch must operate independently of the executive branch (White House) and the legislative branch (Congress), which is the primary reason why Supreme Court Justices are appointed to the bench for life. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
” … The panel ordered the Justice Department to submit a … letter … addressing whether the Executive Branch believes courts have such power, the lawyer said. [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:50 am
If this is so, we should probably spend less time worrying about judicial activism or judicial restraint and more time arguing about the best interpretation of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
To that end, the President has instructed Executive agencies to continue to comply with Section 3 of DOMA, consistent with the Executive’s obligation to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, unless and until Congress repeals Section 3 or the judicial branch renders a definitive verdict against the law’s constitutionality. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
To that end, the President has instructed Executive agencies to continue to comply with Section 3 of DOMA, consistent with the Executive’s obligation to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, unless and until Congress repeals Section 3 or the judicial branch renders a definitive verdict against the law’s constitutionality. [read post]
