Search for: "John Doe, II"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 10:28 pm
The U.S. military does not plan to shoot terrorists on the streets of London. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:43 pm
. *** Michael Gerson recently wrote that “[t]he separation of powers does not work automatically, like a washing machine. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:43 pm
. *** Michael Gerson recently wrote that “[t]he separation of powers does not work automatically, like a washing machine. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
ii. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
Bush turned out to be what John Ashcroft might have called “phantoms of lost liberty. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:42 pm
The Guardian shares that China’s accusation comes after the enactment of controversial laws allowing Japanese troops to fight on foreign soil for the first time since the end of World War II. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
Part II: U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
” Privilege Review Team, Part II Before the tribunal could move on to its scheduled business for the day, Colonel Thomas produced both the cell phone and office number of the PRT for Judge Pohl. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:12 pm
John Henry Merrymen et al., The Civil Law Tradition: Europe, Latin America, and East Asia. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Indeed, the first casebooks in constitutional law, at the turn of the 20th century, began with treatments of constitutional amendment inasmuch as their authors correctly recognized, as John Marshall put it in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:16 pm
These were signified by influential figures, for example, in religion (John Paul II; Joseph Ratzinger; Ayatollah Khomeini; Wahhabi Islam; etc.); and in politics (Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Deng Xiao Ping; Helmut Kohl; Milton Friedman). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
In other words, Rehnquist had read “legislature” to mean a particular entity, not a lawmaking system, something that Smiley, AIRC and now John Roberts reject. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
. # The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 3 (c) may be relevant at the stage of the preliminary investigation in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (see John Murray v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I, § 62). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:13 pm
I. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
John R. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Juan A. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:13 am
A new and relevant paper from Ohlin Kevin John Heller develops an interesting and vigorous challenge to my analysis of Article 35 of the 1977 Protocol to the Geneva Conventions (in which Jens David Ohlin essentially concurs in part III of his essay). [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 11:53 am
It is Satan speaking from the mouth of Freire, John Dewy, and any number of fashionably popular thinkers about education. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:34 pm
Now does that say there was no obstruction? [read post]
