Search for: "Jump v State" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm by Ari Waldman
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
  Finally, and consistently with the decision in  Case C-269/95, Benincasa v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:06 am by Susan Brenner
[They said] they were walking on Nieuman Avenue toward Merrick Road, when a car pulled up and three men jumped out and approached them. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
  Guess they were trying to figure out an amount that the alleged conspirators would for sure jump at. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:39 am by Benson Varghese
While the Guidelines are no longer mandatory and federal judges have far more sentencing discretion since the United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
He fails to note that the legislative change he thinks would be necessary already occurred in the EU with the introduction of Directive 2004/48/EC while in U.S. patent law it has been accepted since the 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
Klarna reported a 16% weekly jump for the final full week of April for online warehouse volume, with similar weekly jumps dating to late March — just before most of the U.S. went under lockdown. . . . [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm by Grayson Clary
If these facts sound familiar to Lawfare readers, it’s likely because of their resemblance to United States v. [read post]