Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
By contrast, "[t]he purpose of equitable indemnification is to avoid the unfairness, under the theory of joint and several liability, of holding one defendant liable for the plaintiff's entire loss while allowing another potentially liable defendant to escape any financial responsibility for the loss. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
By contrast, "[t]he purpose of equitable indemnification is to avoid the unfairness, under the theory of joint and several liability, of holding one defendant liable for the plaintiff's entire loss while allowing another potentially liable defendant to escape any financial responsibility for the loss. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:12 am
Allegedly, the defendant responded by firing a semi-automatic handgun into his cousin’s neck, chin, and chest. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:23 am
This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Plaintiff on behalf of various employees of Defendants. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
”The court provided three reasons why Defendant’s logic was flawed. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:19 am
In Gulfstream, the appellate court reviewed the propriety of a jury verdict holding the tenant liable but not, however, the guarantor of the tenant’s debt. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 11:32 am
After defendant absconded, GEICO sent another reservation of rights, citing defendant’s lack of cooperation with insurer’s investigation. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 5:08 pm
LAMBERT (DISSENTS AND WILL NOT FILE A SEPARATE OPINION) MAZE, JUDGE: Michael Joseph Flick appeals from a judgment of the Fayette Circuit Court finding him liable for the wrongful death of Christina Wittich andawarding compensatory […] [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:42 am
The story began last week when several YouTube channels, including Bungie’s own, were hit with takedown notices over content related to the game Destiny 2. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
The dissenting justice countered in a 60-page opinion that the state’s anti-discrimination laws (similar to those in Massachusetts) hold any person liable for aiding discriminatory practices. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:43 am
Long Form Objection—General: A party seeking discovery of net worth must demonstrate with a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of a claim that a specific defendant is liable for exemplary damages prior to obtaining discovery of a party’s net worth. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 3:43 pm
The lawsuit alleged, pursuant to the Connecticut Product Liability Act, Connecticut General Statutes § 52-572m et seq., that the defendants were liable for Melissa Koutsoukos' death because of a defect in the airbag. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
The Defendant-hospital filed Preliminary Objections seeking to strike the Plaintiff’s vicarious liability claim premised upon the negligence of unnamed agents, challenging certain allegations in the Complaint on the grounds of lack of sufficient specificity, and with respect to a demurrer to the Plaintiff’s corporate liability claim. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm
Instead, the defendants argued that the allegations in the plaintiff’s petition proved their lack of a legal duty. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:30 pm
The defendant in the case is S & Z Service Station Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
It did not control the owner’s decisions as to how to proceed with construction and therefore should not be held liable to third party homeowners for alleged defects resulting from those decisions. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
To hold a defendant liable for contributory trademark infringement, a plaintiff must prove that it knew or had reason to know of specific acts of infringement of the plaintiff’s mark.[3] Generalized knowledge of infringement was, in Tiffany, found insufficient to place an affirmative duty on the defendant to remediate. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:09 am
The contractor that the jury held liable launched an appeal, but the First District Appellate Court concluded that the defendant had a duty to all of the contractors’ employees, and it failed to meet this duty when it allowed the workers to use defective carts. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:35 pm
By Sarah Bayer The theory that patent holders can be held liable under the antitrust laws for blocking competition with a thicket of patents may be down—but it is not out. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:54 am
Or) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 collision which the Defendants were found liable for. [read post]
