Search for: "London v. State" Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:59 pm by Josh Sturtevant
He was tried by Judge Popham who came to London specifically for the trial from his country manor Littlecote House in Hungerford, Gloucestershire. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:42 am by sally
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Smith & Anor v Jafton Properties Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1251 (02 November 2011) Shiva Ltd v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 1189 (02 November 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Business Dream Ltd, Re Insolvency Act 1986 [2011] EWHC 2860 (Ch)… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:40 am by tracey
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Angola) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1238 (01 November 2011) Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249 (01 November 2011) Williams v University… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
On Thursday 10 November there's a  "World Recognition of Distinguished General Counsel: Simon Evans, General Counsel of ArcelorMittal” session London's Plaisterer’s Hall. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:04 am by Steve Hall
About 3,300 inmates are on death row in the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
European and Community trade mark watchers will probably know that an appeal to the Court of Justice has been lodged in Case C-327/11 United States Polo Association v OHIM. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm by Rachit Buch
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:39 am by Howard Knopf
 Panel chairs were Pina D’Agostino, Carys Crag, David Vaver and Victor Nabhan.There were some notable new faces and speakers, including Jonathan Griffiths from Queen Mary, University of London and Mindaugas Kiškis from Lithuania, to name just two. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:05 am
Due to a state of emergency declared subsequently in Thailand, and other difficulties, Tungkum was unable to perform its obligations under the Exports Contract, leading to the London branch granting it a ‘Holiday Period’ in consideration for a revision of the financing agreements. [read post]