Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
The main case on this point is the House of Lords decision in Street v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:02 am
Adopting the maxim that things are more fun in pairs, the Court of Appeal yesterday handed down not one, but two judgments in the Virgin Atlantic aircraft seating cases: Virgin Atlantic Airways v Delta Air Lines [2011] EWCA Civ 162; and Virgin Atlantic Airways v Premium Aircraft Interiors [2011] EWCA Civ 163. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 11:28 am
Rotkiske states that he had no knowledge of the proceeding and therefore failed to appear. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
In last week's opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm
A similar argument was rejected by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex p. [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
This duty is one which will, if necessary, be enforced in equity by way of injunction: see Upmann v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Rivera v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
This question, posed in relation to the law of the Bahamas, was recently answered by the Privy Council (Lords Mance, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Sir Kim Lewison) in Gold Rock Limited v Nylund Hylton [2015] UKPC 17. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
" The judge also noted [still at para 54] how, in light of the decision of the House of Lords in CBS Songs v Amstrad, the ISPs do not owe a common law duty of care [readers who follow the current EU policy debate will note that, while this may be true under common law, the same may be less so or become increasingly less so at the EU level] to Richemont to take reasonable care to ensure that their services are not used by the operators of… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:26 am
What those relevant factors might be is not stated [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Hardly ever has the voice of the timorous spoken more clearly and loudly than in these words of Lord Davey in Janson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
The State’s suggestion, p. 18 pf the reply brief, that the statement’s “primary purpose” is not prosecutorial because it was informal should be rejected on grounds already indicated in Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
The State’s suggestion, p. 18 pf the reply brief, that the statement’s “primary purpose” is not prosecutorial because it was informal should be rejected on grounds already indicated in Davis v. [read post]
