Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 7:53 am
Recently, in their decision in Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court decision, HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department the question that arose was whether a person had to be ‘discrete’ in relation to their sexuality so as to avoid persecution by the state. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011 When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
More on the story HERE & HEREThe full ruling from the Supreme Court : Supreme Court Judgement in AXA General Insurance Limited and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate and others (Respondents) (Scotland) (pdf)The Scottish Government issued the following statement welcoming the Supreme Court’s decision :Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill today welcomed a Supreme Court decision to dismiss a legal challenge to a historic Act of the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
There was also a profile of Lord Justice Leveson also available on BBC iPlayer. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Case: State of Goa v. [read blog]
8 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Case: State of Goa v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Golan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am
The influence of a “graduated approach to proportionality” had two benefits; it took root in society without being perceived as being imposed from above, and it even influenced Strasbourg case law – see for example the extensive quotations from Lord Bingham’s judgments in Pretty v DPP when the Strasbourg Courts came to consider the case in Pretty v United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
In their submissions to the Expert Group, the Scottish Government and the Lord Advocate had called for appeals to the Supreme Court in criminal cases to be ended altogether, so Salmond was no doubt hoping that this is what the Review Group (headed by Lord McCluskey) would recommend. [read post]
