Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 2,940
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Board of Education although not Loving v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
See Sparks v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Jean Hampton. 1988. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
It is arguable that this has happened to the extent that some cases like FAPL v Murphy, or the Meltwater trilogy, have resulted in good precedents made by the UK courts, albeit backed up by CJEU referrals. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Murphy 207 NY 240 : 100 NE 742 (1913); City of Rock Springs v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
This article was originally published in the Boston Bar Association’s Fall 2022 Boston Bar Journal. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
Firstly, it follows a pattern seen in the recent decision of the joined cases in Football Association Premier League and Murphy, in which the starting point for any discussion of originality begins with the principles recited in Infopaq. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am
About eight years ago I published a document called The Rights and Responsibilities of Self-Represented Litigants that took rights-based approach to the role of litigants within the justice system and the expectations they should have as to how they will be treated. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 7:14 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Murphy, No. 06-2292 The text of the Massachusetts SDP statute, as interpreted by state courts, does not on its face violate the due process protections heretofore afforded sexually dangerous persons subject to civil commitment. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:20 am
In Warren v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
” The Appellate Division affirmed in all respects in Quattro Parent LLC v Rakib, 181 AD3d 518 [1st Dept 2020]. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
” They are Rucho v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
