Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 2761 - 2780 of 37,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2021, 8:16 am by Staff Attorney
Hanaur & Company, Smith Barney Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC and is currently working for Raymond James & Associates, Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
YouTube, Inc., 17 F.Supp.2d 514 (SDNY 2010), that puts the onus on content owners to monitor and police user generated content on third party websites for specific instances of infringement. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
   Procedural History"Defendants-Appellants Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.; Lupin, Ltd.; Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Actavis, Inc.; Actavis Elizabeth, LLC; Cobalt Laboratories, Inc.; Cobalt Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sun Pharma Global, Inc; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Wockhardt Ltd.; and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:17 am by D. Daxton White
The White Law Group’s investigation of Cornerstone REITs and specifically the Healthcare REIT is focused on the liability that brokerage firm’s have for selling these investments. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:31 am
HOUSTON --(Business Wire)-- RLS Legal Solutions, LLC (RLS), a full-service legal support company announces today that it will join its records retrieval division with Keais Records Service, Inc., a Nationwide leader in Records Retrieval. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm by dbmadmin
On October 13, 2009, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) settled with AT&T Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:05 am by VC
California-based Biotech Company Gilead Science Inc. has lately lost crucial pre-grant opposition [download] for its anti-influenza drug Oseltamivir Phosphate marketed as Tamiflu. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:20 am
Judgement Released: November 7, 2011   Link to Judgment In upholding an award of partial indemnity costs said to be “virtually the same” as a substantial indemnity award, the Court of Appeal held, among other things, that “while the trial judge did not specifically refer to R. 1.04(1), and while there may be some disproportionality in the [...] [read post]