Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2020, 8:13 am
If people can bank and file taxes on their phones, why should they not be able to vote the same way? [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Empowered by Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
These self-proclaimed democratsclamor to speak for the rising people, over and above the established elites and tired institutions. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Weinberger v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a trailblazer who fought for gender equality as a lawyer and became a beloved hero of the progressive movement as a justice, died on Friday of complications from pancreatic cancer. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:11 pm
European Court of Human RightsMarina v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 10:51 am
See Jacob v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Maffick v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Its mistake was applying that minimal level of scrutiny in the first place. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:26 pm
Oddo v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:46 pm
[I]n Lutz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:33 pm
(See City of Ladue v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
” A more recent story from the Times added that “critics” of the assessment “have focused on the fact that the National Security Agency had a lower level of confidence than the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. on the conclusion that Mr. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
Outcome of Anthem v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
On 13 August Ofcom had a news piece “Fewer people getting news from social media”. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
