Search for: "People v. Fair"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 10,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2007, 8:40 am
US v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court to rule in Magner v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
I don't think anything in the Stevens papers is likely to persuade many people to change their minds about the case. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
The district court originally found for Jack Daniels and rejected VIP’s nominative fair use defense and First Amendment fair use defense. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Q: industries gendered female v. male? [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:08 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm
This is evident in modern day voter suppression, policies that deny Black people fair housing opportunities, redlining practices that perpetuate segregation, legislation such as the Homestead Act, which actively denied economic justice opportunities to Black people, and mass incarceration. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
Aliksanyan
Subscription Required
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil Rights
Co-op Board Violates Fair Housing Act by Refusing Sale of Apartment to Purchaser with Cancer
Hirschmann v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
* Ryan Gile: "New York New York Hotel/Casino Successfully Hijacks NewYorkNewYork.com" * Can Chevrolet get people to stop calling it "Chevy"? [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
We have a fair amount of movement on the relist rolls this week. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:30 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 7:53 am
The defense countered, stating “it is not a hidden fact that living in certain areas you are going to have more people who are accused of crimes, more people who are victims of crime,” and to “hold it against [F.G.] that these things have happened . . . to people that he knows . . . would mean that a lot of people from Newark would not be able to serve. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
USA v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 6:16 am
Rejecting people with conviction records, on the other hand, always rejects the guilty. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
The officers were sending messages in their free time from their personal electronic devices, which most people would surely see as a prima facie “private” activity. [read post]
