Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm
” Similarly, in People’s National Bank of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:25 am
The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Golan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:35 am
Edwards v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
I have watched the discussion with some interest, though, particularly the propensity of media outlets of a given orientation to ascribe anti-vaccine beliefs to the other side. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am
The injunction which was granted against Mr Jones included provisions preventing him from entering a large area in central Birmingham, associating with or contacting ten people named in the injunction, and participating in music videos containing material which might relate to gangs operating in Birmingham. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:09 am
In other words, Courts must strike a balance between what the law provides, and what choices people should be allowed to make for their own lives. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:52 am
Some might think that Atkins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
That ruling was handed down in Conte v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
In both interviews, Dr O’Doherty was asked about the platforming of ‘people connected with paramilitaries on air’ and across local media. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
As the judge commented, “spying on a journalist would be to investigate the people with whom the journalist is in contact. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:47 am
In Cook v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
In 2006, that ferry sank and more than 1,000 people died. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am
Yang suggested that such a law might be too “undifferentiated” and therefore fail under Lujan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The preservation of the enduring practices of the past, practices that have given people's lives structure, meaning, and worth, motivates traditionalist interpretation. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:58 am
As we pointed out in our lawsuit, Dawson v. [read post]
