Search for: "People v. House" Results 2761 - 2780 of 12,999
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
G, 2020 SCC 38 (38585) appeal from 2019 ONCA 264 “Christopher’s Law” draws discriminatory distinctions between people found guilty and people found NCRMD of sexual offences on the [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am by Russell Knight
When people get married, they join their lives…at least on an ongoing basis. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 11:29 am by Ilya Somin
Earlier this week, University of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson and I filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
The oral argument transcript in California v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As it stands, people are pointing out that Trump’s legal challenges are all falling flat. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm by Maria Hook
The decision arose on an application to stay or dismiss the enforcement proceeding at the jurisdictional stage. [2] Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804. [3] The judge noted that the House of Lords had rejected the argument that it should not recognize the courts of the German Democratic Republic (Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner &  Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853), and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was not… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]