Search for: "Peters v. Doe" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
The front page of the New York Times (May 31, 2011) contains a great story by Peter Lattman, quoting me, on the pending case of Simkin v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
Shoesmith was dismissed by Haringey Council following the fall-out over the Baby Peter case. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:59 am by R. David Donoghue
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit handed down its anticipated en banc decision in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Michael O'Brien
  The first word on the matter was Judge Neal Peters McCurn in Indium Corp. of America v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
8 May 2011, 1:28 pm by David Jacobson
In Morley & Ors v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] NSWCA 331 (discussed here) a full bench of the NSW Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the former CFO Phillip Morley and partly accepted the appeal by the former Secretary and General Counsel Peter Shafron. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
But does it go far enough to do the work that democrats want regarding criminalization? [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am by Kara OBrien
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
One-Day Workshop on AI & Evidential Inference (in memory of Craig Callen) in Conjunction with ICAIL 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 10, 2011 Workshop Chairs: Giovanni Sartor & Peter Tillers Program Committee: Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor, Douglas Walton, & Peter Tillers For more information please contact either Giovanni Sartor - giovanni.sartor at gmail.com - or Peter Tillers - peter.tillers at gmail.com Panelists: Ronald J. [read post]