Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 178,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2009, 9:12 am
The issue, as simply as I can summarize it, was whether the plaintiff needed "direct evidence" of discrimination in order to prevail. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:03 pm
Victor took the plaintiff’s virginity. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:21 am
" That's a great argument, but the Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Sack and Failla [D.J.]) rejects it, and plaintiff loses.The Court says that, despite the favorable statutory construction model advanced in the amended ADA, nothing in the ADAAA's text, or its legislative history for that matter, suggests that Congress intended to modify, let alone abandon altogether, the well-established understanding that an employee's "inability to… [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
Bongiovanni, finding that the plaintiff “has not met its burden of demonstrating that production of the source code is relevant and necessary”, denied the plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the inspection and production of the defendants’ source code. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
Nguyen, Plaintiffs’ suspicions were valid considering the circumstances of the communications, and therefore Plaintiffs possesses “a substantial need for [counsel’s emails and consulting agreement with Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
Nguyen, Plaintiffs’ suspicions were valid considering the circumstances of the communications, and therefore Plaintiffs possesses “a substantial need for [counsel’s emails and consulting agreement with Mr. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
AU Optronics Corp., 134 S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
The court granted in part defendant's motion for summary judgment that plaintiff's handset device patent was obvious and rejected plaintiff's argument that the commercial success of the accused phone was relevant to secondary considerations of nonobviousness. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 5:11 pm
It occurred as plaintiff’s father was driving the family to a high school play. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
In a personal injury lawsuit following two motor vehicle collisions, an injured plaintiff appealed the jury’s award of damages. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 11:02 am
The lawsuit claims that the plaintiffs were placed on the list due to their “work and activism opposing Israel’s ongoing military attacks. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:02 pm
Jul. 8, 2024)The court here grants the consumer plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their theory of falsity of Bigelow’s “manufactured in the USA” claim for its tea bags. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff had been knocked to the ground and injured when a loose dog attacked the Plaintiff’s dog in the parking lot of the Plaintiff's veterinarian. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
That judgment awarded temporary custody of the couple’s son to plaintiff. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:39 pm
Plaintiff Robert Cook owned two condominium units at Teal Lake Quiet Shores Condominiums in the Town of Spider Lake. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 3:31 pm
Plaintiff’s mother died as a consequence of her spinal injuries on May 19, 1970. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:01 pm
Davila denied the plaintiffs’ motion to modify the Special Discovery Master order that authorized the forensic imaging of devices belonging to 10 of the more than 90 named plaintiffs in order to allow Apple’s outside experts to performance test the devices, finding that “Apple’s interest in performance testing the forensic images outweighs Plaintiff’s privacy interest...Read the whole entry... [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:53 am
The Sixth Circuit agreed, and affirmed the district court's ruling. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:01 pm
» Related StoriesCourt Denies Southwest Airlines’ Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions Against Plaintiff: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery in Loan Dispute: eDiscovery Case LawDespite Estimate of 37 Years to Crack iPhone, Government Doesn’t Have to Return it – Yet: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:51 pm
The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingency fee. [read post]
