Search for: "President v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 22,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2018, 5:24 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:32 am
” Following the US Supreme Court’s decision to strip the constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
(See McCollum v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
President Biden strongly affirmed Article V and the commitment to the defense of every NATO member. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:00 pm
United States and Cantwell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 3:00 pm
Wright, a test of the President’s power to indefinitely detain inside the United States legal aliens labeled “enemy combatants. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:45 pm
United States, 2009 Westlaw 1796702 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court issued two decisions relating to President Biden’s efforts to get the United States workforce vaccinated against COVID-19. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Related Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:31 pm
The employee immediately called the president of the contractor company about the possibility of a mistake in the bid. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 3:01 am
” (CPLR 3113 (d] emphasis added]) “Absent [as here] a stipulation between the parties to conduct a deposition remotely, a party seeking the remote deposition must demonstrate that the party would encounter undue hardship from submitting to an in-person deposition in New York State” (Rubin v Sabharwal, 70 Misc3d 1216[A] [Sup Ct, NY Cnty 2021] [emphasis added] citing Rogovin v Rogovin, 3 AD3d 352 [1st Dept 2004]; see Yu Hui Chen v Chen Li Zhi,… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:26 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
