Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Coal Development Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Whilst taxi drivers would be careful and knowledgeable purchasers of the taxis, members of the public were merely "users of the service provided by the consumer of the goods" who were likely to pay low levels of attention to the actual taxis themselves. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Impact of violence and other social service challenges. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am
Twin Books v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am
Twin Books v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am
Twin Books v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Failinger Denying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
Joe Ray Bonding Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
The Policy states that it will modify “IPR policy to provide for marching rights for social good when supported by public funds and for co-sharing IPRs generated under PPP. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Daily Star) has coverage of three amicus briefs filed yesterday in Brewer v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
" But in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States (08-1196) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether, to convict a state official for depriving the public of its right to the defendant’s honest services through the non-disclosure of material information, in violation of the mail-fraud statute (18 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Young v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:42 am
On the other hand, the Wikileaks website may well enjoy the same First Amendment protection that the publication of the Pentagon Papers was found by the Supreme Court to enjoy in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:42 pm
The United States District Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment stating that Defendant’s denial of Plaintiff’s application did not have the effect of prohibiting services and it was based on substantial evidence. [read post]
