Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 2761 - 2780 of 14,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 8:22 am by Eric S. Solotoff
As frequent readers of this blog may know, earlier this year, we were the winning attorneys in the landmark palimony case, Maeker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:36 pm
In Joined Cases T-125/03 and T-253/03 Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 1:49 am by Robin Shea
Robins, and Richard Bromley on the “manageability” defense to lawsuits brought under the California Private Attorneys General Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:16 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Read the full story here India reverts abandoned trademark applications to original status To comply with the 13 April 2023 decision of the High Court of Delhi, India, in Intellectual Property Attorneys Association (IPAA) & Anr. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with… [read post]
California’s investigation into Sutter’s business activities began in 2012 when the Attorney General’s Office issued subpoenas to several health systems and insurers seeking information about market concentration and healthcare prices. [read post]
California’s investigation into Sutter’s business activities began in 2012 when the Attorney General’s Office issued subpoenas to several health systems and insurers seeking information about market concentration and healthcare prices. [read post]
California’s investigation into Sutter’s business activities began in 2012 when the Attorney General’s Office issued subpoenas to several health systems and insurers seeking information about market concentration and healthcare prices. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:31 pm by lennyesq
“Absent an appropriation,” the typical motion reads, “Department of Justice attorneys and employees are generally prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis. . . . [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:31 pm by lennyesq
“Absent an appropriation,” the typical motion reads, “Department of Justice attorneys and employees are generally prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis. . . . [read post]