Search for: "Redding v. State" Results 2761 - 2780 of 5,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 2:44 pm
Would you have bet on the Red Sox to win the 1986 World Series? [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Inside Privacy
 Andrus Ansip is nominally the “team leader” on the reforms, with Věra Jourová, Günther Oettinger and Dimitris Avramopoulos competing to be heard on the balance between fundamental rights, business freedoms and the powers of public authorities (e.g. state surveillance), respectively. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm by Charles Casper
This is reminiscent of the late-2014 Red Bull consumer fraud settlement in which consumers had only to state that they purchased Red Bull by checking a box on the settlement website (no proof of purchase required). [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
” In its petition for certiorari, DG argued that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm by velvel
Others of the red flags, also mentioned by the Trustee, were known to some but not all of these large institutions. [read post]
10 May 2007, 4:05 pm
This intriguing possibility is raised by the Third Department's decision today in Matter of Ostad v New York State Dept. of Health, 2007 NY Slip Op 04020. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 12:04 pm by Steve Bainbridge
To state a claim under this theory, the plaintiffs must allege facts supporting an inference that the directors knew about a problem—epitomized by the proverbial red flag—yet consciously ignored it. [read post]