Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2761 - 2780 of 6,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Kemp, No. 113419 – (1) Is a judgment of foreclosure final and appealable, or must an appeal await a final order approving the sale and distributing the proceeds? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am by Marta Requejo
Burkhard Hess, Director of the MPI Luxembourg, has very kindly accepted to have his view on two recent AG’s opinions published in CoL. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:43 am by Ronald Mann
In a term with blockbuster decisions hovering on the horizon about disclosure of presidential records, abortion, workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and protections for Dreamers, Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The Court's rulingKneipp's appeal essentially disputed the Board of Appeal's findings in respect of each of the cumulative conditions which need to be satisfied for an opposition under Article 8(5) EUTMR  to succeed. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:37 pm by Yokum
The amount of gain eligible for the exclusion by a taxpayer with respect to any corporation during any year is the greater of (1) ten times the taxpayer’s basis in stock issued by the corporation and disposed of during the year, or (2) $10 million reduced by gain excluded in prior years on dispositions of the corporation’s stock. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Gareth
Now offering you the opportunity "in principle" to take your injunction anywhere in Europe The IPKat reports today that Advocate General Cruz Villalón has released his Opinion in Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
In the former case, I do not see a violation of the TT-BER, in the latter case, probably so, because a potentially invalid patent still is on the register(s) and has anti-competitive effects).Daryl Lim (John Marshall Law School) undertook a comparative analysis of Genentech (C-567/14) and Kimble v. [read post]