Search for: "Scales v. State" Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
Old Deuteronomy was stillYoung Deuteronomy when Diesel'smarks were first filedDiesel SpA v Montex Holdings Ltd is not a Trade Mark World War on the scale of the Battle of the Buds; it is however part of a family of disputes that have meandered through various European courts and trade mark registries since long before this blog was founded. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
The Governing Body and Its ResponsibilitiesIn January 2000, the State Council formed the Western Region Development Leading Group headed by Premier Zhu Rongji, deputy headed by Vice Premier Wen Jiabao and attended by 19 directors from the State Council and relevant ministries. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by Adam Feldman
United States, are also the top two cases generating the most interest so far this term. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
The lower the threshold, the greater the likelihood of legitimate content being removed at scale, whether proactively or reactively. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
In 2011 LegalZoom stated, “We have served approximately 2 million customers over the last 10 years. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Big Brother Watch said in its complaint to the ICO that PimEyes enabled “surveillance and stalking on a scale previously unimaginable. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
The government's claim was that while in Nigeria and continuing when he came to the United States, he was involved in a `large-scale, Nigerian fraud scheme. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A stated that the defendant's primary drug of choice is marijuana but that he had used cocaine intermittently over a long period of time. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]