Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 5,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 3:56 pm
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure of their property. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 12:13 pm
People must be safe in their homes and protected from illegal searches and seizures. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 11:22 am
Both cases essentially deal with the reach and protection of the Fourth Amendment; namely, that search and seizures are unreasonable unless based on probable cause. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 11:22 am
Both cases essentially deal with the reach and protection of the Fourth Amendment; namely, that search and seizures are unreasonable unless based on probable cause. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 11:22 am
Both cases essentially deal with the reach and protection of the Fourth Amendment; namely, that search and seizures are unreasonable unless based on probable cause. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am
`However, in some cases a search by a private citizen may be transformed into a governmental search implicating the 4th Amendment if the government coerces, dominates or directs the actions of a private person conducting the search or seizure. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
This case was decided on a "trespass," as opposed to a "reasonable expectation of privacy" search and seizure theory. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:58 pm
Here in Texas, what will happen to the Fourth Amendment right to protection from invasive search and seizure? [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:58 pm
Here in Texas, what will happen to the Fourth Amendment right to protection from invasive search and seizure? [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:11 pm
If there is probable cause, no warrant is required to search a car for an instrumentality of a crime; logically, no warrant is required to seize a car that is itself an instrumentality. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
But neither has the gravitas of, for example, the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures or the right, for that matter, to own a gun. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:25 am
I will up date this post further once I have had time to read the Jardines opinion to determine what if any impact it may have on other dog sniff search and seizure cases under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:35 pm
The Constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures provides the greatest protection in one's home. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm
California Penal Code § 1524 authorizes a court or magistrate to issue a warrant for the search of a place and the seizure of property or things identified in the warrant where there is probable cause to believe that specified grounds exist, and also provides for a warrant procedure for the acquisition of stored communications in the possession of a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
It authorizes a judge to issue a general warrant permitting a peace officer to “use any device or investigative technique or procedure or do anything described in the warrant that would, if not authorized, constitute an unreasonable search or seizure”. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
When police search a house on the authority of a warrant, for example, we must trust them not to open drawers that the warrant does not authorize them to open. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Vu was acquitted after the trial judge determined that evidence obtained from the search of a laptop and cell phone was inadmissible due to an unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:35 pm
Our proposal is simple: All private communications and documents stored online with service providers should have the same protections from unreasonable search and seizure as material locally stored. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
This boarder doctrine is a product of United States criminal law that allows basically unfettered searches and seizures within 100 miles of a border without the need for a warrant. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:41 am
The case went to trial and the plaintiff lost on her Fourth Amendment seizure claim. [read post]
