Search for: "State v. Allen" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., Craig Allen Nard, The Law of Patents 34 (2008) (asserting PTO grants patents on 39% of applications); Brief of the Boston Patent Law Ass'n as Amicus Curiae in Support of Genentech, Inc., on the Merits at 5, Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm by Barbara Moreno
., State Consumer Protection Law (2022). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:17 am by SHG
  Sometimes it's good to be a senior judge with life tenure.In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
  No right to assisted dying under the ECHR In the case of Dániel Karsai v Hungary [2024] ECHR No. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Attorney Daniel Alter in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Doe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
Written for children, the book contains about 150 illustrations by award-winning writer and illustrator Allen Say - but are those illustrations going to cause problems? [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1152(a)(1)(B), which permits the secretary of state to set “procedures” for visa issuance. [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:27 am
Since, as the Indiana Supreme Court noted, "in juvenile delinquency adjudication proceedings, the State must prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt", we are essentially dealing with a criminal case. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm by David Lat
Allen get argued in the Supreme Court — or we might see a complaint filed in trial court, in Maples v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:43 am by John Rubin
Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979) (even if a presumption is considered permissive, there must be a “rational connection” between the facts proved and the fact to presumed); see also State v. [read post]