Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 29,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
In short, Marsh v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:18 pm
On 19 January 2015, the Constitutional Court of South Africa handed down judgment in the case of Democratic Alliance v African National Congress and Another ([2015] ZACC 1), a case concerning text text messages relating to President Jacob Zuma sent to over 1.5 million voters by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in the run up to the 2014 general elections. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 4:17 am
Wolfe: State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:03 am
United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
See FDA v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The statute’s plain text also makes this clear, but the plaintiffs’ lawyers are trying to craft a different result in the courts than what Congress provided. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:55 pm
United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (Commerce Clause allows Congress to regulate decisions not to engage in transactions with persons with whom plaintiff did not wish to deal). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
The case is National Meat Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
The case is National Meat Association v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
The only state supreme court ever to probe the meaning of the phrase is that of Oregon, which, in Vannatta v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:58 am
[Mike Rappaport, Law and Liberty] Tags: Article V, constitutional law, Virginia [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
The first argument, in Jones v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:20 pm
One example is Colon Health Centers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:58 pm
: The Country Road to Take Firearm Regulation Back Home to Congress and the States. [read post]
