Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 4,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
The stars seem to have aligned such that our state appellate courts as well the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:08 pm
Although I continue to believe, contra Thravalos, that the Supreme Court plurality got it right in Hamdan v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:38 am
In an unpublished case found at 2012 WL 646338, filed February 27, 2012, the Second District, Division 4 Court of Appeal made a ruling in some of the cases. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Wolff, 10 NY3d 100 (2008), in which the New York Court of Appeals recognized a common law right of an LLC member to sue derivatively. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Wolff, 10 NY3d 100 (2008), in which the New York Court of Appeals recognized a common law right of an LLC member to sue derivatively. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:31 am
The vast majority of lawsuits filed across the state are filed in the District Court Divisions. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:10 pm
In a case addressing important issues affecting local agencies and landowners (disclaimer: I represented the County of Napa in the trial court and on appeal), the First District (Division 4) Court of Appeal on April 20, 2012 filed its published opinion affirming a judgment upholding the County’s clarifying lot line adjustment ordinance (Ord. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
Pitman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:18 am
I guess the Court of Appeals does not think it's a big deal to be a volunteer dance instructor. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
It therefore adhered to the general rule that " '[i]f the execution of the agreement ... be fair, no further inquiry will be made' " (Levine v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
As the Court of Appeals has advised, "[i]t is a cardinal rule of construction that a court should not adopt an interpretation which will operate to leave a provision of a contract . . . without force and effect" (Corhill Corp. v S.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
As the Court of Appeals has advised, "[i]t is a cardinal rule of construction that a court should not adopt an interpretation which will operate to leave a provision of a contract . . . without force and effect" (Corhill Corp. v S.D. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
There are instances in which an agreement is so one-sided that, in the words of the Court of Appeals in Christian v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The filing date of the impugned patent was February 1, 2000.Background[4.1] The Opposition Division (OD), in the decision under appeal, held that, out of the documents that the opponent had submitted, i.e. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm
District Court, plaintiff attempted to appeal to the Ninth Circuit but failed to follow procedure after I became the Assistant City Attorney in Redlands) what may or may not have been a Complaint in United States District Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
The defendants appealed. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
"The Court of Appeals agrees. [read post]
