Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 133,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 7:05 pm
In Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:05 am
V. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:38 am
”As to a Fifth Amendment defense in such cases, in Brogan v United States, 522 US 398, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a former union official who falsely answered a federal investigator’s questions. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 7:06 am
Patton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:28 am
In general, a federal court may not hear a suit brought by any person against a nonconsenting state. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:42 am
The Court of Appeals has held that the Americans with Disabilities Act may require the state to waive certain eligibility deadlines if waiver would reasonably accommodate a disabled person under the Act.The case is Mary Jo C. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:11 pm
Hunt v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 8:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:42 pm
Supreme Court held today, in the case of Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:28 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.May 4, 2010 - 10 AM: In re CEMCO, Inc., Serial No. 77432339 [Refusal to register KOOLER KIOSK for "Water cooler attachment for storing, holding and displaying articles" on the alternative grounds of mere descriptiveness or deceptive misdescriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1)].May 6, 2010 - 10 AM: In re Florida State University Credit Union , Serial No. 77415033 [Section 2(e)(1)… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) BX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 481 (04 May 2010) Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 483 (04 May 2010) Al Rawi & Ors v Security Service & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 482 (04 May 2010) Home Office v Tariq [2010] EWCA Civ 462 (04 May 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Popa, R (on the application of) v District Court… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:04 am
I wanted to bring you up to speed on the Renfroe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
All State Bar members and the public may watch the meeting on the State Bar of Texas YouTube channel. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
It has been suggested that the court may have been better off enforcing the 'equal' portion of Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:33 am
The California Supreme Court held that state agencies may enter private properties for environmental and geological testing activities in some cases and that a jury may award damages if property is damaged during that testing. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
It may be noted as a preliminary, that what the policy in Commune d’Ans is not about is the neutral functioning of the state: removing the signs does not change the substance. [read post]
