Search for: "State v. Prime" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm by Lisa McElroy
  In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In the interest of balance it is worth stating that the Court of Appeal judgment in EKT v News Group Newspapers Ltd on Tuesday ([2011] EWCA Civ 439) is of some importance. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:49 pm by Boston University Law Review
Massachusetts on State-Level Criminal Prosecutions and Procedure Valerie J. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Phil
Judge Clark considered the T-bill rate as too low, the state rate (or the infringer's borrowing rate) as too high, but the prime rate, compounded quarterly (as opposed to annually), to be just right. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm by My name
Second, device fingerprinting is a prime example of technology developing much more quickly than regulatory schemes. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:23 am by Adam Wagner
The UK had attempted to appeal the recent decision in Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:42 pm by Douglas Reiser
  Perhaps most enticing to prime contractors, RCW 39.76.040 provides statutory attorneys fees for any action to recoup this interest. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
The Draft Defamation Bill According to the Deputy Prime Minister the Draft Bill is intended to “end the libel farce” and “will let the press be free”. [read post]