Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 13,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2021, 7:31 am
Robert Troy Hoff tried to register this trademark, for use on clothing: Some Georgia company that had a different trademark objected: No registration for Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
In Monday’s decision in the newly minted, Matal v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
BackgroundIn July 2016 Bayer Intellectual Property (the Applicant) sough to register the figurative sign above as an EU trade mark. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm
Dairy Export Council et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:19 am
In New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:26 pm
Veeck v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:51 am
The Court found that it was wrong to have referred the case to the Extra Division of the Court of Session, and this Extra Division was wrong to have stated the original 12 month suspension of right to practice could subsequently be extended. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:08 pm
Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
The Sixth Circuit, in Does v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm
Rivera, SJC - 10802 Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:40 am
Acerra, the owner of an Estonian registered industrial design for a bottle, informed the Estonian Tax and Customs Office (the Maksu-ja Tolliamet, 'MTA') that Sintax was attempting to supply a product in Estonia in bottles embodying the registered design. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:47 pm
Cash Register Auto Insurance of Leon County, Inc., 946 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), and Stolzer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm
That's the whole gist of the Court's contrast in New York v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
FM Approvals, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:30 am
That changed on March 2, 2010 when the United States Supreme Court decided Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:21 am
The parties in USA DANCE, INC. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:06 am
The third and final opinion of the day was in United States v. [read post]
