Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 2761 - 2780 of 20,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am by CMS
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
—not only the corporate income tax, but also both parts of the payroll tax, withholding of personal income tax, and sales and excise tax.[19] In absolute terms, the individual income tax gap also dwarfs the corporate income tax gap. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]